About Me

Name: On the Right
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

Campaign Lies, Media Double Standards

Over the next six weeks, as the candidates trade charges and counter-charges, the self-appointed media umpires will act as if they are the ultimate fact-finders in Campaign '08. Writing for National Journal, columnist Stuart Taylor asserted that the media's track record thus far makes him just as skeptical of the press.

     Taylor declared: "Many in the media have been one-sided, sometimes adding to Obama's distortions rather than acting as impartial reporters of fact and referees of the mud fights." Rather than cleaning up the record, Taylor reported several instances when the media are themselves guilty of perpetuating partisan disinformation.

For Taylor's piece in full: www.nationaljournal.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Losers

Democrats concede on drilling

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Free Markets Work

NHS or the American medical system? A testimony

This is a lengthy read, but worthwhile.  It talks honestly about the benefits and drawbacks of both systems, and gives readers a choice of nightmares.  Would you rather have the most attentive and consistent of care and get forced into bankruptcy, or would you rather have more efficiency, less cost — and get ignored or worse while fighting to get attention?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Brickbats

Heart-ache: Tiny terrorist gives Bush speech thumbs down at the UN; Update: Obama rips UN, Ahmadinejad

A spontaneous gesture of disapproval? Hardly. ABC caught him waving at the White House press corps intermittently to get their attention. He may be a cretin, but he’s a media-savvy cretin.

Here’s the transcript of his speech. Nine pages in all, composed in his trademark turgid “Up With People” meets “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” style.

Update: He must be joking.

Below is a Statement from Senator Barack Obama on President Ahmadinejad’s Remarks

“I strongly condemn President Ahmadinejad’s outrageous remarks at the United Nations, and am disappointed that he had a platform to air his hateful and anti-Semitic views. The threat from Iran’s nuclear program is grave. Now is the time for Americans to unite on behalf of the strong sanctions that are needed to increase pressure on the Iranian regime.

“Once again, I call upon Senator McCain to join me in supporting a bipartisan bill to increase pressure on the Iranian regime by allowing states and private companies to divest from companies doing business in Iran. The security of our ally Israel is too important to play partisan politics, and it is deeply disappointing that Senator McCain and a few of his allies in Congress feel otherwise,” said Senator Barack Obama.

Am I hallucinating or hasn’t this tool made his own willingness to meet with either Ahmadinejad himself or the people who sent him to the UN the cornerstone of his foreign-policy approach?


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mortgage "Crisis"

The gall of these absurd "hindsight hearings!" People like Chris "Countrywide" Dodd should be answering questions, not asking them. Secretary Paulson (a Democrat like all these big banks) could have been tougher. These Democrats demand accountability; let's give it to them on November 4th.

WSJ: Blame Fannie Mae and Congress for the Credit Mess

No Blank Check: Democrats Take Talking Point from the US Communist Party

"'We live in dangerous times,' Chuck Schumer said. We do. We have Islamofascists blowing up a Marriott hotel in Pakistan. We have Russians helping the Iranians build an anti-missile system, and sending jets down to Hugo Chavez along with the ChiComs. Yet Chuck-U Schumer is afraid of... 'the lowly mortgage.' Chuck-U Schumer is afraid of documents, inanimate objects that in the end can be shredded!" Hillary flat-out lied in excusing her husband's role in creating this mortgage mess. This is history revisionism. Robert Rubin, Clinton's former treasury secretary and now an Obama advisor, undercut Obama's line of attack that Phil Gramm's bill (which Clinton signed) caused this mess.

GateWayPundit: Bush Called to Reform Fannie & Freddie 17 Times in 2008 Alone

Obama is in need of a bailout as Biden's gaffes keep piling up.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Read It

Important new paper: Climate Science: Is it currently designed to answer questions? - Abstract: For a variety of inter-related cultural, organizational, and political reasons, progress in climate science and the actual solution of scientific problems in this field have moved at a much slower rate than would normally be possible. Not all these factors are unique to climate science, but the heavy influence of politics has served to amplify the role of the other factors. By cultural factors, I primarily refer to the change in the scientific paradigm from a dialectic opposition between theory and observation to an emphasis on simulation and observational programs. The latter serves to almost eliminate the dialectical focus of the former. Whereas the former had the potential for convergence, the latter is much less effective. The institutional factor has many components. One is the inordinate growth of administration in universities and the consequent increase in importance of grant overhead. This leads to an emphasis on large programs that never end. Another is the hierarchical nature of formal scientific organizations whereby a small executive council can speak on behalf of thousands of scientists as well as govern the distribution of ‘carrots and sticks’ whereby reputations are made and broken. The above factors are all amplified by the need for government funding. When an issue becomes a vital part of a political agenda, as is the case with climate, then the politically desired position becomes a goal rather than a consequence of scientific research. This paper will deal with the origin of the cultural changes and with specific examples of the operation and interaction of these factors. In particular, we will show how political bodies act to control scientific institutions, how scientists adjust both data and even theory to accommodate politically correct positions, and how opposition to these positions is disposed of. (Richard S. Lindzen, Program in Atmospheres, Oceans and Climate, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Richard Lindzen: Climate science: Is it currently designed to answer questions? - Richard Lindzen is not only a renowned climate scientist but also an experienced person who has met many people and understood how many institutions work. In his new, published 35-page paper that is also available via the arXiv, Climate Science: Is it currently designed to answer questions? (PDF) he shows that institutionalized climate science is becoming an inefficient tool to answer scientific questions. (The Reference Frame)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Advances

New Process Eliminates a Fertilizer’s Blast Threat - A major chemical company will announce Tuesday that it has found a way to render nitrogen fertilizer useless as an explosive, and improve its value to some crops.

The company, Honeywell, of Morris Township, N.J., has patented a method for combining ammonium nitrate fertilizer with a second type of fertilizer, ammonium sulfate. Ammonium nitrate can be soaked in diesel fuel to produce a powerful bomb and is a favorite of terrorists, but when chemically tied to the ammonium sulfate, its chemical structure is changed so that it is no longer explosive.

Chemists had been looking for ways to render ammonium nitrate nonexplosive since the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City was destroyed by a truck bomb in 1995, killing 168. (New York Times)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain Responds to Biden

McCain announces the creation of the "Coalition to Protect Coal Jobs." Via Hot Air: ARLINGTON, VA -- Congresswoman Shelly Moore Capito (R-WV), former Virginia Governor and Senator George Allen, former Congressman Scott McInnis (R-CO) and RNC Chairman Mike Duncan will announce the McCain-Palin campaign’s Coalition to Protect Coal Jobs, a nationwide group including . . . Go
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bailout

The Paulson plan is unpalatable, but it also might be necessary. Meltdown

Quit blaming Gramm. Phil Sees the Blame Shadow

As Rome burns, McCain and Obama misfire on who is to blame. Find Me a Demon

Conservatives must answer three questions: Is the $700 billion intervention necessary? Will it work? And is it morally justifiable? Of Interventions and Conservative Principles

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

He’s Rolling

Biden on FDR’s management of the 1929 crash

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On Clean Coal, Biden Takes Bold Stand Against, Um, Obama’s Position

Via the Standard, here’s the relevant plank of Team Barry’s plan for green jobs:

Develop and Deploy Clean Coal Technology.

Obama’s Department of Energy will enter into public private partnerships to develop five “first-of-a-kind” commercial scale coal-fired plants with clean carbon capture and sequestration technology.

And now here’s the Greasy one, summarily outsourcing those jobs to China. Did I or did I not tell you that the man’s a genius?

That’s twice now in about 18 hours that Biden’s undermined his own campaign. Are they just not cc’ing him on the memos anymore
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We’re Adults — We Can Handle It

Time to ban polling?

Jazz Shaw asks the provocative question at The Moderate Voice, wondering who really benefits from the public dissemination of so many competing surveys.  On both the state and national levels, multiple pollsters using varying methodology have produced results that would indicate landslides for both John McCain and Barack Obama, and just about every possible intermediate result as well.  Jazz wonders why these numbers get treated any differently than election-day exit polling, and whether they should get treated the same

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Junk

Speaker Pelosi would 'save the planet' with higher gas prices - Nancy Pelosi has changed her mind. She'll allow a vote on drilling for America's offshore oil potential after all—sort of.

To paraphrase the old saying, however, "A woman convinced against her will is of the same opinion still." Pelosi's first reaction to the public's drilling demands was, "We've got a planet to save. Nothing less is at stake other than civilization as we know it."

Mrs. Pelosi represents the most liberal city in America, and she wants the U.S. to cut its greenhouse emissions in half by 2050. She's backing cap-and-trade legislation that would literally make gas, oil and coal too expensive to burn.

Don't worry about the oil companies actually doing more offshore drilling under her new bill. The U.S. Geological Survey thinks most of the economically recoverable offshore oil is within 50 miles of the coast. Pelosi's bill would open some Outer shelf areas beyond 50 miles, but it would permanently ban drilling in all areas within 50 miles without the state's approval—and she's offering the states no cut of the oil money to encourage their OK. This bill is just a lie to the American people about encouraging more U.S. oil; it's election-year cover for the House Democrats.

Also remember that the final line of eco-defense is always the courts. In February, the Feds leased 487 parcels for oil exploration in the coastal regions of Alaska's Chuckchi Sea—and the Green movement has already ensnarled all 487 leases in lawsuits. In 1973, faced with the OPEC oil embargo, Congress had to waive the environmental laws to permit the Trans-Alaska Pipeline. (Dennis T. Avery, ESR)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Charlie's Angles [Double Standard]

If a prominent Republican neglected paying taxes, then insulted the disabled, his political career would be over instantly. Is a double standard saving House Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Rangel?

Read Full Article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Powell's No-Brainer

Islamic terrorists have attacked a hotel and a U.S. embassy in the span of two weeks. Russia is invading American allies and sending warships to our hemisphere. What would Obama do? Gut the military.

Read Full Article

That's right, the Democrat choice for commander in chief wants to not only slash military spending but dismantle our nuclear arsenal — all so he can pay for his massive new welfare programs.

Didn't hear that in his acceptance speech in Denver? That's because he knows better than to make such an anti-military plan widely known. But he made the little-noticed pledge just before the Iowa caucus to a left-wing pacifist group that seeks to reallocate defense dollars to welfare programs. The lobbying group, Caucus for Priorities, was so impressed by Obama's anti-military offering that it steered its 10,000 devotees his way.

In a 132-word videotaped pledge (still viewable on YouTube), Obama agreed to hollow out the military by slashing conventional and nuclear weapons. The scope of his planned defense cuts, combined with his angry tone, is breathtaking. He sounds as if the military is the enemy, not the bad guys it's fighting.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »