About Me

Name: On the Right
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

Raked Over Coal

Al Gore has rightly been scolded for encouraging civil disobedience to stop global warming. But his little-noticed follow-up statement might be even more foolish — and dangerous.

Read Full Article


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rescuing ACORN

Democrats want to use profits from the bailout as a slush fund for liberal activist groups, even those involved in vote fraud to help elect Barack Obama.

Read Full Article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Resolution Time

There's one thing the do-nothing Democratic Congress does know how to do, never mind the need for quick bipartisan action to quell a financial crisis.  And that is to play politics.

Read Full Article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Could The Crisis Have Been Avoided?

Saddest Thing About This Mess: Congress Had Chance To Stop It

As the president recently said, Democrats have been "resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me . . . to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."

No, it wasn't President Bush who said that; it was President Clinton, Democrat, speaking just last week.

Just as Republicans got blamed for Enron, WorldCom and other early-2000s scandals that were actually due to the anything-goes Clinton era, the media are now blaming them for the mortgage meltdown.

But Republicans tried repeatedly to bring fiscal sanity to Fannie and Freddie. Democrats opposed them, especially Sen. Chris Dodd and Rep. Barney Frank, who now run Congress' key banking panels.

History is utterly clear on this.

In 2005, then-Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan told Congress: "We are placing the total financial system of the future at substantial risk."

That year, Sen. John McCain, one of three sponsors of a Fannie-Freddie reform bill, said: "If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system and the economy as a whole."

Sen. Harry Reid — now Majority Leader — accused the GOP of trying to "cripple the ability of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to carry out their mission of expanding homeownership."

Some GOP members are complicit. But Fannie and Freddie were created by Democrats, regulated by Democrats, largely run by Democrats and protected by Democrats.

That's why taxpayers are now being asked for $700 billion.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Camp Misrepresents House Republican Quote

Obama camp caught lying shamelessly about McCain, Roy Blunt

The Obama campaign is circulating a YouTube clip of Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo. -- the No. 2 House Republican -- talking about the role of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., at the disastrous White House meeting, on MSNBC today.

In the Obama campaign clip, Blunt says of McCain: "Clearly, yesterday, his position on that discussion yesterday was one that stopped a deal from finalizing."

Said Obama spox Bill Burton: “Congressman Blunt just confirmed what’s been clear since John McCain rode into Washington at the eleventh hour -– Sen. McCain’s political theatrics succeeded only in stopping a bipartisan deal. During the most serious economic crisis of our time, we don’t need erratic posturing, we need steady leadership to protect American taxpayers and put our economy back on track."

But that's not the full quote. What Blunt actually said is quite different.

REP. ROY BLUNT: I do think that John McCain was very helpful in what he did. I saw him this morning, we’ve been talking with his staff. Clearly, yesterday, his position on that discussion yesterday was one that stopped a deal from finalizing that no House Republican in my view would have been for, which means it wouldn’t have probably passed the House. Now, Democrats are in the majority. They can pass anything they want to without a singe Republican vote, but they don’t seem to be willing to do that. I’m please we can have negotiations now that get us back towards things that we think can protect the taxpayers better, create more options, and frankly be better understood in the country than the plan—the path we were on a couple of days ago.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Whoopi Wrong

Whoopi Again Misleads on Bush's Iraq and Afghanistan Policies

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts" the late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, a Democrat, once said. Apparently, the ladies of "The View" disagree. Debating which presidential nominee has better judgment, Whoopi Goldberg once again [0] forwarded the myth that the Bush administration completely ignored Afghanistan and focused instead on Iraq.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In The Tank For Obama

Obama's Margin of Victory: The Media

The Democratic contest between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton was the closest nomination in a generation. But Obama had a crucial advantage over his rivals this year: the support of the national media, especially the three broadcast networks. A new study by the Media Research Center documents how at every step of his national political career, network reporters showered the Illinois Senator with glowing media coverage, building him up as a political celebrity and exhibiting little interest in investigating his past associations or exploring the controversies that could have threatened his campaign.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Must Be No Democrats Around

Couric IDs 'Senior Republican' Stevens, Didn't Cite Rangel's Party

On Thursday night, CBS anchor Katie Couric began a short news update on Senator Ted Stevens by immediately highlighting his party affiliation:
"The senior Republican in the U.S. Senate went on trial today for corruption..." But the night before, in an item on ethical questions surrounding Congressman Charles Rangel, a House veteran who is Chairman of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee, Couric failed to inform viewers he's a Democrat.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

For It After He Was Against It

Nuance: Biden suddenly decides he’s all for clean coal

Via Mary Katharine Ham. I say unto you for the third time this week: The man’s a genius.

Campaigning in Pennsylvania coal country on Thursday, the Democratic vice presidential nominee said the government should steer more money to clean coal — a term used to describe a variety of emerging technologies that burn coal for electricity without producing as much pollution.

“I am for clean coal,” he told The Associated Press following a speech in Wilkes-Barre…

The Delaware senator was working a rope line in Maumee, Ohio, on Sept. 17 when a voter asserted that wind and solar energy were “flourishing” in Ohio and then asked Biden why he supported clean coal.

“We’re not supporting clean coal,” Biden replied, putting his hands on the woman’s shoulders. “Guess what? China’s building two every week, two dirty coal plants, and it’s polluting the United States. It’s causing people to die.”


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Change

Ho hum: Obama’s lawyer threatens TV stations that run NRA ad

MORE THUGGISHNESS: Obama threatening the licenses of TV stations that run NRA ads.

Plus, from Jacob Sullum at Reason, Why Obama is Vulnerable On the Second Amendment.

This is the ad that's got the Obama campaign so upset. You can make up your own mind, but it doesn't seem especially unusual for a political ad, though it's certainly likely to hurt Obama in the bitter-clinger demographic. Of course, more people will see it now because of this controversly. And here, at Politico, is the NRA response. (Bumped).

MORE STILL: Reader Carolyn Gockel writes: "Why Obama is Vulnerable On the First Amendment: The whole NRA flap is going beyond gun rights advocates...I'm not as pro-gun as you and I am furious." Yeah, and the bit with state law enforcement officials threatening critics is even worse. I wonder if the ACLU will weigh in on this one? Seems like a good opportunity for them to show their nonpartisan nature.

FactCheck flubs Obama gun fact check



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Really?

Pelosi: Democrats don’t have the votes to pass the bailout bill; Update: Vote unlikely before Wednesday?

Probably just her way of building leverage for some of those left-wing goodies
they want in the final package, but I don’t know. There must be a few Blue Dogs looking at the
polling on this and getting nervous. How long does the leadership have to pass something before people on their own side start defecting and the whole thing turns into Amnesty Debacle redux? Or am I just being naive, and in fact this is a classic Pelosi gambit a la her original maneuvering on drilling in which she encourages House members whose reelection prospects are dicey to vote however they need to knowing that she’ll get her way anyway? In fact, losing a few Democratic votes arguably makes it easier for her to claim that support for the bill is bipartisan, since it means that the few votes they already have among the House GOP will be decisive, not mere ornamentation.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Bailout"

"If this deal is so wonderful, the Democrats have the votes to pass it on their own and keep the GOP from getting any credit. But they want Republican votes on this bill 'cause Democrats don't want to be on the hook alone for this."

The House GOP doesn't have the votes to block anything. If the Democrat bill is so great, pass it! But they need cover for Obama, so they can hide things like the money for ACORN that Sen. Graham spoke out against.

"One of the things that the House Republicans have found in this bill is that it sends 20% of all profits from the bailout to ACORN, the illegal Democrat fraudulent voter registration group that is directly tied to Barack Obama. Well, how can the House Republicans support that?"

Harry Reid nine days ago: "No one knows what to do." Yet they had a deal, and McCain blew it up with "presidential politics"?

"Obama hasn't said where he stands on this bailout plan.

GateWayPundit: Democrats Threaten to Prosecute Anti-Obama Speech


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Embattled Firm And Its Employees Spread Millions Around Washington In Donations And Lobbying Expenses

Goldman

Employees of Goldman Sachs are listed
as a top contributor to 55 separate
members of Congress.

43,457,362 reasons to support Goldman Sachs

Goldman Sachs bankers are also the number one contributors to the Barack Obama presidential campaign, giving $691,930 to his campaign in this cycle, according to the records.

John McCain's campaign has received substantially less from Goldman Sachs employees, $208,395, although they are, as a group, his fourth largest contributor.

In the 2008 election cycle, Goldman Sachs bankers have come up with $4.8 million in contributions to federal candidates, according to the records. 72 per cent of Goldman's money this year has gone to Democratic candidates and the national party, the majority party in Congress.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »