About Me

Name: On the Right
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

Obama Puts His 77 Cents In

Barack Obama has criticized John McCain's actions in the case of Lilly Ledbetter, who sued for alleged pay discrimination. But if Obama supports equal pay for equal work, why doesn't he do it in his office?

Read Full Article

When the issue shifted to the Supreme Court in last week's presidential debate, Obama said he would appoint Supreme Court justices "who hopefully have a sense of what real-world folks are going through." Not those who have a sense of what the Founding Fathers had in mind when they wrote the Constitution. He wants those who believe in a "living Constitution" that changes with the liberal fad du jour.

He claimed "the Supreme Court made it more difficult for a woman named Lily Ledbetter to press her claim for pay discrimination." Actually the Court did nothing of the sort. It merely said the law put a time limit on filing such claims and that Ledbetter missed the cutoff — by almost two decades. They interpreted the law to mean what it says as written.

As Carrie Lukas, vice president for policy and economics at the Independent Women's Forum, informs us, when producing the "77 cents" statistic Obama repeats in a campaign ad, the Labor Department does not in fact take into account factors such as years of experience, hours worked, education, service interruptions for marriage and child rearing.

Crunching the numbers, Obama's 28 male staffers were paid a total of $1,523,120 for an average salary of $54,397. Obama's 30 female employees divided $1,354,580 for a female average salary of $45,152. Obama's female staffers, on average, make just 83 cents to the dollar his male staffers make.

McCain's office, by contrast, is a feminist fantasy. McCain's 17 male staffers carve up $916,914 for an average salary of $53,936. His 25 female employees split $1,396,958 for average pay of $55,878. In McCain's office, a woman earns $1.04 for every buck a man makes.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cold Reality

Funny how economic concerns pull the mind away from foolishness such as global warming. But weather goes on, and in many places it doesn't happen the way fear mongers predict.

Read Full Article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain On Nukes: Yes We Can

Barack Obama needs to explain why, if we can power our lights with old Russian weapons, we can't expand our use of nuclear power. Is there really such a thing as nuclear waste?

Read Full Article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

If You Liked The New Deal And The Great Society, Wait Until You See What’s Coming Next

WSJ: Fear the coming liberal revolution

What will a Barack Obama presidency mean?  It will almost certainly give Democrats an undivided government, their first since 1993.  In that period, Democrats tried nationalizing the health-care industry — and that was under the direction of a DLC-sponsored moderate President.  Under Barack Obama, the Wall Street Journal
predicts a return to 1965 … or 1933

Read the entire WSJ editorial.  They note that in 1933 and 1965, liberal Democrats fundamentally abused the nature of government and its relationship to the economy in ways we still have not corrected.  What changes can we expect in an Obama administration?

  • Nationalized health care
  • Union supremacy and a boost of cash to the Democratic Party
  • Massive tax increases and redistributionism
  • Curtailed free-speech protections

It’s not a pretty picture.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Setting The Record Straight

NRSC ad: Who’s to blame?

The National Republican Senatorial Committee has an ad out explaining what happened, who kept blowing sunshine up our collective skirt, and who tried to stop the trainwreck from happening:

I’d say that’s an effective ad, especially since it uses the actual clips of leading Democrats to demonstrate their attempts to keep Fannie/Freddie’s market distortions operational. Too bad it runs over 2 minutes; I would like to see this get played on television stations nationwide in the last two weeks of the election.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oops

Shock: People take advantage of free government health care

Hawaii has ended an experiment with universal health care for children because it proved a little too successful.  Seven months after launching Keiki Care, a flood of enrollments caused it to run over budget.  The social engineers in Hawaiian government just learned a lesson about free-market economics and the effect of government distortion (via The Corner):

Hawaii is dropping the only state universal child health care program in the country just seven months after it launched.

Gov. Linda Lingle’s administration cited budget shortfalls and other available health care options for eliminating funding for the program. A state official said families were dropping private coverage so their children would be eligible for the subsidized plan.

“People who were already able to afford health care began to stop paying for it so they could get it for free,” said Dr. Kenny Fink, the administrator for Med-QUEST at the Department of Human Services. “I don’t believe that was the intent of the program.”

Fink gets this entirely wrong.  Taxpayers didn’t get this for free.  They paid for it with their taxes Keiki Care took taxes and directed it into creating a universal health-insurance program for children, and apparently didn’t set any income requirements for entry.  Why wouldn’t the taxpayers whose money funded the risk pool take advantage of it?


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stories Missed By The MSM

Guess who else has tax liens?

In their haste to pillory Joe for the audacity of asking a tough question of Obama, the Tanning Bed Media missed a couple of other interesting tax liens.  Patterico does the work of the TBM:

Oh — I almost forgot to mention: Martin Nesbitt, the treasurer of Obama’s campaign, has tax liens. So do his companies.

You’d think that matters more than the tax liens of Joe the Plumber, wouldn’t you? But good luck finding a Big Media story about Nesbitt’s liens.

If tax liens are such an indicator of character and trustworthiness, wouldn’t it have more significance for the treasurer of a presidential campaign than for a man who just asked a question of the candidate?  If the national media has such an interest in investigating a plumber who made a couple of national appearances, why wouldn’t they have at least the same interest in the people running a major party presidential campaign?  Of course not.  The same people who instruct us that Barack Obama’s 20-year membership in Jeremiah Wright’s church while Wright called 9/11 “chickens coming home to roost” now interrogate Joe the Plumber on national TV about his brief flirtation with the Natural Law Party.

Because, you know, associations matter when choosing a plumber, but apparently not when choosing a President.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Feinting Right

The last presidential debate on Wednesday revealed what will likely be Barack Obama's final weeks' strategy — to sound like a conservative. Voters should see right through it.

Read Full Article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (19) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Taking A Peek Behind Bill Ayers' Office Door

An op-ed writer thinks Bill Ayers is now a model citizen. If that's the case, why would an unrepentant terrorist have an unrepentant cop killer's picture on his office door?

Read Full Article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Marxism's Rebirth?

America's Communist Party is giddy over current political events, saying its movement has reached a "turning point." There's no mystery why. Their candidate is the White House front-runner.

Read Full Article

Part of the Communist Party USA's glee can be attributed to the current economic turmoil. The radicals who make up its membership have long rooted for capitalism to fail.

But it can't be denied that the popularity of Barack Obama, the most far-left candidate to run for president as the nominee of a major party, is a big part of the Communist Party resurgence.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Wrong Target

The presidential debates featured Bush bashing from both sides. It's not hip to say so, but either nominee can only wish he'd accomplish as much as George W.

Read Full Article

First, a great deal of the global financial crisis can be blamed not on Bush but on Democrats, ranging from former President Bill Clinton to Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., to the Congressional Black Caucus, who used banks to further a social justice agenda.

During his first term, Bush tried to establish a new regulatory agency to rein in the irresponsibility practiced by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but Democrats in Congress derailed it.

Moreover, it's well worth noting that Sen. McCain reversed his opposition to the Bush tax cuts, conceding their efficacy in generating millions of jobs — and that Sen. Obama announced he might have to keep those tax cuts in effect to prevent a worsening of the economy. (If they've been so devastating to the country, as Obama has repeated for so long, why not get rid of them as soon as possible?)

Finally, there is President Bush's success in the global war on terror.

We have won a war Democrats declared unwinnable — that is, unless a President Obama reverses the gains of Gen. Petraeus and our troops.

Equally important in the war against terrorism is the Bush Administration's perfect record in protecting the homeland in the seven years since 9/11.

This was not luck. Both the National Security Agency's (NSA) terrorist surveillance program and the CIA's detainee interrogation program foiled planned operations to kill hundreds, perhaps far more.

Both candidates should realize that, in spite of today's low presidential approval surveys (and remembering that Congress's are far worse), history will judge this president very well — better than whichever one of the candidates that succeeds him, we'll bet.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Tax Cut Is Really Just Redistribution

Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama promises to "cut taxes for 95% of American workers." That's not possible. Why? More than...

Read Full Article

Why? More than 30% pay nothing in federal income taxes. Obama comes up with this number by calling tax credits "tax cuts." One can debate whether these things are good or bad, but they are not tax cuts.

McCain offers refundable tax credits for health care, as well as other credits, but he doesn't insult the intelligence of the American people by calling them "tax cuts."

When Obama's credits go to people who pay no federal income taxes or who pay less than the value of the credit, they are not "tax cuts." They are transfers of money from one pocket to another, or redistributions of wealth, but they are not tax cuts.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Election '08

If Obama wins (and the election is not over), America faces dire consequences. We cannot afford this guy. We can't afford his taxes, his judges, or his national security policy. The first thing he'll do will be to pass the Fairness Doctrine to shut us up. Folks, it'll take 25 years to undo all the damage.

"One day after Obama talked to Joe the Plumber on the rope line, Joe has been all over the media. Where is the MSM interviews of Bill Ayers?"

Democrat Ohio Secretary of State Asks Supreme Court to Let Her Cheat

Even ACORN Says Obama Lied About 'Em!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »